Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Not So Sterling-Silver and the Slippery Slope

The National Basketball Association (NBA) Commissioner Adam Silver on Tuesday banned Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling for life following racist comments he made in private that were recorded.  He was quoted as telling his MGW (Mistress/Girlfriend/Whatever) that he did not want her to bring "black people" to his games and that he more or less did not appreciate her hanging around "them".  While reading the transcripts and listening to what audio I could listen to, this man is appalling in every sense of the word.  However, I am somewhat confused of what has transpired over the past few days.

On Sunday, the day after the audio was released, it is reported that Sterling has a long history of racial discrimination including charges in the NBA and that nobody should be surprised by this.  On the panel discussing these charges was National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Interim President and CEO Lorraine C. Miller.  The NAACP Los Angeles chapter was planning to honor Sterling for a Humanitarian Award, which has since been rescinded.  Sterling was honored by NAACP once before in 2008.  If Sterling has a history of this behavior, is a well-known racist and nobody should be surprised by this outcome, how in the world can an esteemed organization such as the NAACP not only honor him once, but almost twice.  I guess money can buy just about anything.  This is obviously a mistake by the NAACP and I would hope they review their high end donors and honorees after this debacle.

To quote Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban when interviewed about the possibility of forcing a sale of the Clippers by the league "it will be a slippery slope" and it most likely will not happen overnight.  This all goes back to the "history" of this man's behavior, why now?  When he was evicting colored people illegally in rent controlled housing it wasn't an issue? It wasn't an issue when the Department of Justice brought discrimination charges against him and he was quoted as saying that the reason he did not like to African-Americans was "Black tenants smell and attract vermin." and that Hispanics "smoke, drink and just hang around the building,"? Mark Cuban feels that forcing a sale will open a Pandora's Box from special interest groups to pressure league officials into action when people aren't aligned with their views, and he could be right.

The question of the players being able to opt out of contracts because of this was brought up during the press conference and I must say that is not an option.  It comes down to two things.  First, and I keep going back to it, is the history of Sterling, if the agents of these players did their homework rather than go after the biggest contract they would have known this.  Second, when you sell your soul to the devil you live with the consequence.  The NAACP learned that the hard way and they reportedly returned the money Sterling donated.  Will the NBA players wishing to opt out do the same thing? Unlikely!

Donald Sterling is a vile human being.  He is married with a mistress, OUT IN THE OPEN.    When asked about his actions as a landlord his quote was "I own the building, so I can be racist".  He just doesn't care and that compounds the issue.  He was also quoted as saying to an emplyee that reported a request for repairs and refund due to damage "I'm not going to do that, just evict the bitch"

If you have been following this story and are celebrating the decision keep in mind this does not solve the problem.  The players still "play" for Sterling, he still signs the checks.  What does forcing the sale of the franchise do to Sterling?  He stands to make a 480% profit on his investment, just on the sale.  That's showing him.  He will still be a racist, just a half of a billion dollars richer. While the courts haggle over the sale of the team, and they will, does that mean his "ban" mean he doesn't have to pay the bills?  The punishment at this point is on the surface.  This is far from over.

The NBA needs to tread lightly here on how they react to public discourse.  They have opened the door, now it is a matter of who they let in to voice their issues.  Leading to a "slippery slope".

3D

If you don't take it from me, ask my wife


No comments:

Post a Comment